An incomplete win for Obama
June 25, 2012 -- Updated 1808 GMT (0208 HKT)
- Ed Morrissey: High court ruling on Arizona immigration law is largely a win for president
- Morrissey: Ruling is an incomplete win since the fate of Obamacare coming within days
- Case is a reminder Obama has done a poor job of enforcing immigration law, he says
Editor's note: Edward Morrissey is a senior editor and correspondent for the conservative commentary website HotAir.com.
(CNN) -- One of the most anticipated Supreme Court decisions in recent times -- Obamacare -- was not announced Monday. That gave an air of anti-climax to an important decision that was handed down, one with its own political baggage and implications for the election, although not nearly as fraught with peril as the health care law.
In any other session, the outcome of Arizona v. United States might have been the headline case of a Supreme Court season. Instead, the Obama administration will have to celebrate an incomplete victory in the next 72 hours before the court delivers its ruling on the fate of Obama's signature legislation.
The White House largely won in challenging Arizona's harsh 2010 immigration law, although it might be difficult to sell that point. Last year, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down four provisions of the law, ruling that the federal government pre-empted state regulation on immigration. The Supreme Court mostly agreed.
Unfortunately for the administration, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court on the most controversial part of the law, the "show me your papers" provision that requires law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of people while enforcing other laws.
Arguably, this provision was designed to force the federal government to take action on illegal immigrants by identifying them to the Department of Homeland Security.
By upholding this provision, the Supreme Court allowed Gov. Jan Brewer to claim victory for Arizona's immigration enforcement efforts:
Voices of Arizona immigration
Arpaio: We'll continue to enforce laws
"Today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for the rule of law. It is also a victory for the 10th Amendment and all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens. After more than two years of legal challenges, the heart of SB 1070 can now be implemented in accordance with the U.S. Constitution."
But that narrow win is tenuous. The court pointedly did not rule that the provision was constitutional, which means that further court cases may well strike it down at a later date. Arizona can put it into effect, but it probably won't take too much time before a case comes up that will put the provision back under scrutiny.
The White House will portray the Supreme Court's ruling on immigration as a principled victory over a state that had infringed on federal prerogatives to manage immigration. It may even get a couple of days' worth of traction on that argument. That won't last long, though, for two reasons.
First, the coming Obamacare ruling will vastly overshadow this nuanced win by Thursday morning. Second, this win serves as a reminder that the Obama administration has done a poor job of enforcing immigration law -- and along with Obama's recent decision to stop deporting some young illegal immigrants -- border states have no reason to expect a second term that will improve on the first.
Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.
Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Edward Morrissey.
Part of complete coverage on
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 2348 GMT (0748 HKT)
While in jail, Nelson Mandela was able to fundamentally change himself and emerge as a potent leader, says John Battersby.
December 6, 2013 -- Updated 2139 GMT (0539 HKT)
Stephen Trachtenberg says if students pay $55,000 a year, they may feel they've paid for the As in dollars as well as sense.
December 6, 2013 -- Updated 1856 GMT (0256 HKT)
Frida Ghitis says conservatives should take note: Rising inequality is the proven enemy of stability.
December 6, 2013 -- Updated 1514 GMT (2314 HKT)
James Hansen says science tells us how to avoid devastating the planet through carbon emissions; all we need to do is act.
December 6, 2013 -- Updated 1408 GMT (2208 HKT)
Immigration activist Eliseo Medina, who just concluded a fast on the National Mall, says that unless immigration reform is passed by Congress, the country's legacy in jeopardy.
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 2256 GMT (0656 HKT)
Kennedy Odede says Nelson Mandela's example kept his spirit alive when he lived on the streets as a child in a dangerous slum in Nairobi.
December 6, 2013 -- Updated 0037 GMT (0837 HKT)
Jim Sterba: A woman was mauled by a bear. Coyotes and wolves are increasing. We need wildlife to fear us.
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 1222 GMT (2022 HKT)
Sally Kohn says hospitals are closing in GOP states that refused to expand Medicaid. Republicans want to spite Obama, but they end up hurting their constituents.
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 1451 GMT (2251 HKT)
Dean Obeidallah: Who could've ever predicted that 140 characters could screw up so many people's lives?
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 1225 GMT (2025 HKT)
Matthew Fraser says racism is a sensitive issue in France, and Bob Dylan's comments have touched a raw nerve.
December 5, 2013 -- Updated 1450 GMT (2250 HKT)
Johnita Due says we can understand and empathize with the pain felt by survivors of the Newtown shootings, yet access to public records is vital if we are to fully understand our society and its ills.
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 2255 GMT (0655 HKT)
Robert Ellsberg says Rush Limbaugh's remarks show no one is troubled by a pope who loves the poor until the pope dares to reflect on the causes of poverty
December 4, 2013 -- Updated 1801 GMT (0201 HKT)
Brian Donovan says we don't know what went through Paul Walker's mind in the moments leading up to his fiery end, but the crash may provide yet another example of speed's addictive power
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 2256 GMT (0656 HKT)
Kyle Ayers says it's OK to share conversations publicly as long as the people involved are kept anonymous.
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 0153 GMT (0953 HKT)
Sanjay Gupta says whether the Affordable Health Care Act ends up improving health has a lot to do with whether Americans start making better personal decisions about eating, exercise and weight loss
Today's five most popular stories